Questions? Answers! Daily Carbohydrate Intake

“Courage is fear holding on a minute longer.”
George S. Patton

How Many Grams of Carbs?

Maybe there’s a certain “carb” vibe in the air as of late?  I don’t know, but I have been asked more times than normal over the past couple weeks what my daily carb intake is – even from people who have a tough time distinguishing exactly what a carbohydrate looks like in the wild.  Since I absolutely abhor the thought of weighing and measuring my eats in any form or fashion, my usual answer to this question in the past has been the simple “I dunno…minimal?“.  However, having now tracked my carb intake over the last couple of weeks (which happened to be run-of-the-mill weeks for me – nothing out-of-the-ordinary, food wise – I can now say that I never ventured north of approximately 50 grams of carbs in a day,with most day’s intake falling in the 20 -30 gram range.  This all is a rough estimate, of course; what exactly is a “standard” carrot?  A “medium” apple?

This may sound outlandish to some at fist blush, but look for a moment at what I eat – or rather, the carbohydrate sources that I don’t eat.  No bread, no grains of any kind (I will swill a beer now and again, however), no pasta, rice, legumes or soy.  And of course, nothing processed and absolutely no sugar, HFCS, or any crap that even resembles such.  I eat very, very little fruit.  The vast majority of my carbohydrate intake is vegetable based, and that leans heavily toward leafy greens.  I do have some root vegetables now and again (carrots, parsnips, etc.) and/or a small sweet potato.  I also take in carbs from the raw, unpasteurized milk I drink on occasion.

What fasting has taught me is this: when I’m truly hungry, what I crave is fat and protein; fat especially.  I think there is most definitely a lesson to be learned in that.

In health,

The Battle of the (Mainstream) Heavyweight Diets

“One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown is the belief that one’s work is terribly important.”

Bertrand Russell

The following video is of a lecture given in January 2008 by Christopher Gardner, PhD, assistant professor of medicine at the Stanford Prevention Research Center, and focuses on the largest and longest-ever comparison (as of that time) of a selection of  four popular diets studied under real-world conditions.  The diets in question were the Ornish, Zone, LEARN (i.e., the diet recommended by most academics and the USDA — the food pyramid we all know and love), and, last but not least, the Atkins diet.  The 311 participants, (all pre-menopausal, overweight women) were divided into 4 groups, with each group having been provided 8 weeks of  “in-depth” nutritional training using the representative flagship book for each diet.  Training was led by a dietitian who preached the magnificence and utter superiority of each group’s assigned diet.  All of this makes for an interesting study because of the real-worldliness of having these participants attempt to “follow the book” for themselves (subsequent to the 8 weeks of brainwashing, that is).

An additional interesting twist here is that Professor Gardner is (was?) a twenty-five year vegetarian, who, having come into the study with a heavy, pre-conceived bias, admits (and you have to give him kudos for this), that his long-standing notions of the efficacy of a vegetarian diet may have been completely unfounded.

Of course, we in the Paleo community would’ve loved to have seen the Paleo way represented in this study — but hey, the fact that Atkins was included is a monumental step in itself.  In fact, Dr Gardner does bring up the subject of the Paleo diet toward the end of the lecture — to the hoots of snorts and laughter from what I can only assume was a very learned and open-minded audience (really, no sarcasm intended).  Whatever; I’m in the pharmaceutical business — all those snorts and all that laughter sounds like job security to me.

Anyway, I do think this lecture is well worth the time investment.  You may not learn anything new about diet, per se, but you’ll certainly pick up quit a bit in the way of diet psychology.  Keep in mind as you watch just how well a Paleo diet would have fared in this trial.  Remember, you’d have had 8 weeks to teach someone the whys and hows of the Paleo way; 8 weeks to stage for, and transition through, the carb Jones; 8 weeks of social re-conditioning and n=1 individualization tinkering.  What book would I have “preached”?  Well, personally I’d have opted for Primal Body, Primal Mind, by Nora Gedgaudas.  For homework, I’d have assigned selections from Taubes’s GCBC.

A few interesting things to keep in mind as you watch:

Dr. Gardner’s chart presentation on the spread of obesity throughout he US is powerful.  We all know these facts, yes — seeing it presented in this fashion, though, brings this static information “alive” in a profound way.

Notice as well all the maddening, tunnel-visioned viewing of the study’s statistical results data through the old “calories in, calories out” prism.  It’ll make you want to jump through the screen and remove the good doctor’s blinders.  It reminds me of the story of the two fish, wherein one fish asks the other, “what’s this stuff water I keep hearing about?”

Interesting, too, is the behind the scenes view of what it required to land a study grant, and how painfully long the wait is between grant acquisition and the release of actual study findings.  And add to this all of the Political wrangling — both in academia and in the government realm — that must be traversed.  It’s mind numbing.   If it were not for the internet allowing the immediate connection of like-minded folks, all of whom are actively engaged in n=1 studies of “Paleo science”, Paleo would yet to even have a fair hearing in the world of nutritional science.

Kudos, then, to us — for actively advancing the Paleo science.

And a big round of thanks are in order to the Balanced Existence website for having re-excavated this find.   You can read their interesting commentary on the lecture, here.

Sit back and enjoy.

In health,