A client asked me recently how she would know that she’s making adequate “progress”, with the context, of course, being fitness-related, and more specifically, strength biased. And I wish I had a ready answer for her; the truth of the matter though, is that “progress” is a tough thing to define, and even tougher to measure — it’s a little like herding cats. Sure we can say, for instance, that one’s squat has increased 30 lbs over a certain time frame — but what if in gaining that increased squat poundage, we had to sacrifice a tenth of a second off of a 40 time; 20 seconds off of a 5 k? The fact of the matter is that “progress” can only be measured relative to — and, in fact can only be defined by — our stated goals. As Dan John is fond of saying, the “goal is to keep the goal, the goal…” Now, this might sound a bit flippant at first blush, but I can tell you from first-hand experience just how difficult this is in practice. Dan also likes to base weight room progress on the movements: a deadlift max, maximum number of dead-hang pull-ups and the standing triple jump; you’d be hard-pressed to argue for better weightroom yardsticks and yet, what about the more nebulous indicators — blood work, say? Bodyfat levels…overall exuberance for life? Ever been around a bodybuilder in the final week (or hell, final month) of contest prep? Exuberance is not exactly a word that comes to mind. What if we’re looking to be strong, yes — but not at the expense of chipping away at our overall health (this happens to be my goal, by the way)? In that case, I think Art DeVany’s “metabolic headroom” is a great place to start. In other words, what’s the separation between your metabolic “idle” and metabolic “redline”? I’ll have to come up with a working definition here that doesn’t leave my intended audience with their eyes rolling back in their heads. Any help and/or thoughts on getting this point across to those not geeked-out on diet and fitness is greatly appreciated.
The week’s training — a mixed bag…and I like it like that!
It’s not often that I rumble through three training sessions in a row, but that’s just the way things shook-out this week. So in true power-law, random-loving fashion, I rolled right on along with life as it hit me.
Tuesday: a quick-hitter supper-set with these two –
barbell muscle-ups (from the high hang): 115 x 8; 135 x 6; 145 x 5, 5, 5
Efficient Exercise exclusive hip press: 400 x 12; 500 x 6; 545 x 4, 4, 4
I like this pairing for a quick, total body workout. If I had a bit more time, I would have tossed weighted pull-ups into the mix, and I’ll add those in next time I do this little number. Also, I’ve got some good 4-6 rep range numbers to work with now so as to employ Autoregulation principles to the exercise loading next time out.
Wednesday: making the most out of ready access to Nautilus equipment –
Nautilus pec dec: 110 x 11 (41×1 tempo), then immediately to
weighted dips: 70# x 6, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2 rest-pause extended set
and to round things out…
Nautilus pull-over: 230 x 9+ (not quite 10), 50×0 tempo
The extended rest-pause set: think of this as a hybrid between a DeVany-esq Hierarchical set, and the standby classic rest-pause method. The pec dec serves as a good pre-exhaust movement, here; big rep drop-off between the first and second “set” of dips. Without the pre-exhaust, we’re looking at an initial rep range of 10 to 12 or so, and an increased loading prior to the initiation of each and every “set” until we reach (about) the 2-rep threshold. From this point, we’ll bust-out doubles until failure.
Thursday: holy friggin’ HIT, Batman! Check-out the clip below –
If you weren’t keeping score, here’s what Skyler put me through:
Thanks for the insight, Keith. Personally I’ve been measuring my own progress recently with a big old weightroom yardstick, as you mentioned. Over the past few months I’ve had some great — and eye-opening — success with the Westside conjugate method, without so much as setting a single goal.
But now I’m finding that I need to bring some organization and goals to the process in order to stay on track.
Thanks, bro.
-Mike
What. The. Heck. Is. Going. On. Here? I was laughing out loud (sorry). Grunting like an ol gizzley bear. I’d love to try that thing. Looks pricey compared to mother nature and nuthin… Mechanical squishing.
I noted in a facebook post on the same subject that I sound the same way when I find the refrigerator empty of beer 🙂
He’s telling the truth, too. So, I make sure the beer never runs out. lol
Meesus TTP
Keith,
I think I will be calling you “DRAGO” from now on 😉
GREAT stuff! Thank you for sharing.
Marc
Now is the time on Sprockets when we dance!!!! (In honor of the all black outfits).
Having experienced the CZT myself, I found myself watching gritting my teeth and clamping my ass cheeks together. I need a mouthpiece just to watch. Well done EE.
I`ve been through a lot of your posts regarding self-regulated exercise and I’d like to know if these concepts are viable for someone who has been exercising for a short time (a couple of years on and off, with only a few months of weight lifting).
If so, what sort of framework (trying really hard not to say “program” here…) would you suggest for such a newbie? I already do quite a bit of walking and martial arts, so I’m more insterested in the strength training aspect of the matter.
Thanks in advance!
One need be concerned with self-regulated schemes only after having initially established a firm strength footing. In the early-going of a lifting career, it is perfectly suitable to track load, reps, time-under-load, and other parameters/markers directly. In other words, until out-of-the-gate progress stalls, there’s really no additive value to Autoregulation. Once that initial forward progress comes to a halt, though — and it will — then it’s time for manipulation via Autoregulation.
Thanks for your quick reply. I’m yet a begginer, so I guess it’ll take quite some time for me to be able to really get something out of autoregulation. I’ll stick to standard programs for the time being.
Your blog is a great source of Paleo ideas, so I’ll will be sticking around!
Thanks for the good words, my friend. And yes, no need to rush; this is a lifetime investment, a life-long journey.
Hey Keith,
As always, you’ve put together a post that causes me to give pause and think….
Progress towards what? I guess that’s the question. I don’t sense most people in the gym give this much thought, other than perhaps, “lookin’ good naked!”
So, here I am just a tick past the big 5-0, training as long as I can remember, playing or competing at a pretty high level in everything from football to martial arts to the “Tough Mudder” competition. Always excited to train, eager to learn, and happy as hell when I sit back exhausted after kicking my ass at something.
So for me, I suppose I measure progress in a more subjective manner than say, how high a vertical jump I have, or how fast I can run 100 meters. For me, it’s really more of quality in my training, how I “feel,” my eagerness to “get after it” and the sense of satisfacton when I’m done.
I guess I don’t see a final destination or point – it just keeps going, becoming refined as I learn more and then reaping the juice out of what I can bring to the table – that’s my progress.
Cool topic.
Nice Post, progress measurement is definitely not a one size fits all. However, I cannot escape the suspicion that a ‘geometric’ relationship between strength, speed, and power can be used to ascertain peoples overall fitness goals and provide a measuring stick.
Overall health = a balanced relationship so a equilateral triangle, A bias in one or more areas would create obtuse or acute triangles and measurements could be adjusted to match prioritized areas.
Add cleans and maybe a 5K time to Dan John’s list and prioritize according to your personal triangle and I think you have a pretty foolproof list. Sort of a human equivalent of the automotive 0-100-0, and skidpad test.